This is an old revision of the document!


Similarity Operator

Aliases Projection, Inner Product


A generalization of an operator that computes the similarity between a Model and a Feature.


How do we calculate the similarity between the model and input? Features found in practice may require different kinds of measures to determine similarity.


Similarity: $ R^n \times R^n \rightarrow R $



In its more generalized sense, similarity is a measure of equivalence between two objects. For vectors, it is described as the inner product. For distributions, it can be described as the KL divergence between two distributions. There are many kinds of similarity measures, this is documented in a survey [Cha 2007]. Cha classifies similarity functions into eight different families.

Similarities are also tightly related to hashing functions. Hash algorithms be classified into serveral families: pairwise similarity preserving, multiwise similarity preserving, implicit similarity preserving and quantization.

In its most generalized sense, a neuron can be thought of being composed of a similarity function between input and parameters, the resulting measure is fed through an activation function. The conventional neuron is an inner product between the input vectors and the internal weight vectors. This is equivalent to projecting the inputs to a random matrix of weight vectors.

The convolution can be considered as a generalization of a correlation operation. Convolution is equivalent to correlation when the kernel distribution is symmetric.

Shannon's entropy is a similarity measure equal to the KL divergence between the observed distribution and a random distribution.

Fisher's Information Matrix (FIM) is a multi-dimensional generalization of the similarity measure. The metric resides in a non-euclidean space.

Does the metric have to map to 1-dimensional space?

Does the metric have to be Euclidean?

What are the minimal characteristics for a metric?

Are neural embeddings favorable if the preserve a similarity measure.

Known Uses

Related Patterns

Pattern is related to the following Canonical Patterns:

  • Irreversibility and Merge form the essential mechanisms of any DL system.
  • Entropy is a global similarity measure that drives the evolution of the aggregate system. The local effect of a similarity operator is to neutral(?) to entropy.
  • Distance Measure generalizes the many ways we can define similarity beyond the vector dot product.
  • Random Projections shows how an collection of similarity operators can lead to a mapping that is able to preserve distance.
  • Clustering is a generalization of how space can be partitioned and at its core requires a heuristic for determining similarity.
  • Geometry provides a framework for understanding information spaces.
  • Random Orthogonal Initialization is a beneficial initialization that leads to good projections and clustering.
  • Dissipative Adaptation, where the energy absorption it equivalent to similarity matching.
  • Adversarial Features are a consequence of the use of a linear similarity measure.
  • Anti-causality expresses the direction of predictability that is a consequence of performing a similarity measure.

Pattern is cited in:


See Sung-Hyuk Cha, “Comprehensive Survey on Distance/Similarity Measures between Probability Density Functions,” International Journal of Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, Volume 1 Issue 4, 2007, pp. 300-307 for a survey.[ii] The author identifies 45 PDF distance functions and classifies them into eight families: Lp Minkowski L1 intersection inner product fidelity (squared chord) squared L2 (χ2) Shannon’s entropy combinations. Sum-Product Networks: A New Deep Architecture

A Survey on Learning to Hash

Learning to hash is one of the major solutions to this problem and has been widely studied recently. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey of the learning to hash algorithms, and categorize them according to the manners of preserving the similarities into: pairwise similarity preserving, multiwise similarity preserving, implicit similarity preserving, as well as quantization, and discuss their relations. Probabilistic Similarity Logic Uncertainty in Neural Network Word Embedding Exploration of Threshold for Similarity A Survey on Metric Learning for Feature Vectors and Structured Data A continuum among logarithmic, linear, and exponential functions, and its potential to improve generalization in neural networks DEEP NEURAL NETWORKS AND THE TREE OF LIFE

By applying the inner product similarity of the activation vectors at the last fully connected layer for different species, we can roughly build their tree of life. Our work provides a new perspective to the deep representation and sheds light on possible novel applications of deep representation to other areas like Bioinformatics.

Mercer kernels are essentially a generalization of the inner-product for any kind of data — they are symmetric though self-similarity may not be the maximum. They are quite popular in machine learning and Mercer kernels have been defined for text, graphs, time series, images. Cosine Normalization: Using Cosine Similarity Instead of Dot Product in Neural Networks

To bound dot product and decrease the variance, we propose to use cosine similarity instead of dot product in neural networks, which we call cosine normalization. Our experiments show that cosine normalization in fully-connected neural networks notably reduces the test err with lower divergence, compared to other normalization techniques. Applied to convolutional networks, cosine normalization also significantly enhances the accuracy of classification and accelerates the training. The differential geometry of perceptual similarity

Human similarity judgments are inconsistent with Euclidean, Hamming, Mahalanobis, and the majority of measures used in the extensive literatures on similarity and dissimilarity. From intrinsic properties of brain circuitry, we derive principles of perceptual metrics, showing their conformance to Riemannian geometry. As a demonstration of their utility, the perceptual metrics are shown to outperform JPEG compression. Unlike machine-learning approaches, the outperformance uses no statistics, and no learning. Beyond the incidental application to compression, the metrics offer broad explanatory accounts of empirical perceptual findings such as Tverskys triangle inequality violations, contradictory human judgments of identical stimuli such as speech sounds, and a broad range of other phenomena on percepts and concepts that may initially appear unrelated. The findings constitute a set of fundamental principles underlying perceptual similarity.